Can't believe I missed this! But both games have their positives. The Wii version feels more like the 2008 Prince of Persia than any of the Sands of Time series. There's the one-button jumping, the lway the game heads back on itself at times, the dialogue between the Prince and his genie, the lackluster combat... I could go on. The story's actualy pretty good, and that's generally why I've played through it a half-dozen times (well, that and the guide). It's not a bad game, it just has a hard time feeling like a Prince of Persia game at times.
The PC/S3/60 version feels much more like the rest of the Sands of Time series, having virtually identical controls, though there are several points of note. The music is good as always, the graphics are impressive (except for the Prince himself, who now looks like a football hooligan), the level design is pretty good (if a little illogical when thought about in real-world terms) and the voicework is generally acceptable.* The story, on the other hand, is complete balls, and there's little to no replayability factor, so now I've got the Platinum trophy I doubt I'll ever play it again.
In short - they're both above average games, but neither is better then the other. And they're both worse then the other games in the Sands of Time series.
Anyway. Latest game I bought was Wolfenstein 2009, which cost me a grand total of 99p. Brand new. Not sure why it was reduced from £10, but I'm sure I'll find out when I start playing it.
* Taken from my review, viewable at my site sithlordrising.blogspot.com







Reply With Quote





