Compiling Zelda Classic instructions?

[Tamamo]

@ZoriaRPG
Don't use the .proj files. You can't compile ZC 2.5.2 with those.

[Tamamo]

@Saffith does the makefile compile on Linux as far as you know?

[Gleeok]

@Saffith does the makefile compile on Linux as far as you know?

Are you talking about relative directory preprocessor errors? That's the only thing I can think of. If so, the problem is probably that I add "src/" to the include path and maybe nothing else does.

[Tamamo]

@Gleeok
No, I have had no such errors since I switched to MSYS.

[ZoriaRPG]

@ZoriaRPG
Don't use the .proj files. You can't compile ZC 2.5.2 with those.

I have the .proj files from the old 2.50.1 source pack. I had originally intended to make a pacage with that too, but overall a makefile is always the way to go for other people to use it.

We need to discuss policies though, for Git. As of now, there is no stable build 'master', with forks for additions. Without that, the git repo is just a trainwreck, and we're never going t have good participation. I think we should have a 2.5.2 masterbranch, for people to do things with, if they wish, and a 2.x master branch, that has all of the known-stable additions/changes to date, that you, Gleeok, Saffith, and I have made.

That's the script drawing stuf, and probably some npc and object stuff.

This will allow interested people an entry point to download, compile, and test; and a point to make their own contributions.

[Tamamo]

I have the .proj files from the old 2.50.1 source pack. I had originally intended to make a pacage with that too, but overall a makefile is always the way to go for other people to use it.

We need to discuss policies though, for Git. As of now, there is no stable build 'master', with forks for additions. Without that, the git repo is just a trainwreck, and we're never going t have good participation. I think we should have a 2.5.2 masterbranch, for people to do things with, if they wish, and a 2.x master branch, that has all of the known-stable additions/changes to date, that you, Gleeok, Saffith, and I have made.

That's the script drawing stuf, and probably some npc and object stuff.

This will allow interested people an entry point to download, compile, and test; and a point to make their own contributions.

I vouched already for separating them into two repositories. But gleeok isn't arsed enough to do it apparently.

[Tamamo]

@Saffith @Gleeok

obj/bind.o: src/bind.h src/config.h
$(CC) $(OPTS) $(CFLAG) -c src/bind.h -o obj/bind.o $(SFLAG) $(WINFLAG)

I'm doing something wrong here not sure what though. :/

[Gleeok]

You know that header files are not supposed to produce object files right?

[Tamamo]

You know that header files are not supposed to produce object files right?

Then it needs to be included in another cpp file.

[Gleeok]

Then it needs to be included in another cpp file.

Que? Donde esta mi medicamento? No habla Engles.