Progress Report

[Samer]

@Gleeok

I've never done DOP before, yet I would believe OOP is simplier.
I can't think of a single decent game engine that uses DOP.

Edit: However, if you are the only one working on this, then do what's more simple for you yet things like this take teams with 100+ developers to get it done in a "reasonable" amount of time.

Just do what you think is best

Best screen capture tool ever
https://www.techsmith.com/download/jing/

[Anarchy_Balsac]

@Gleeok

I've never done DOP before, yet I would believe OOP is simplier.
I can't think of a single decent game engine that uses DOP.

Edit: However, if you are the only one working on this, then do what's more simple for you yet things like this take teams with 100+ developers to get it done in a "reasonable" amount of time.

Just do what you think is best

Best screen capture tool ever
https://www.techsmith.com/download/jing/

I think he's just saying he prefers to do what works, rather than stick established programming mindsets. OOP is efficient and mostly optimal, but there are times when you don't NEED to create an object for something in your program, and when doing so can actually overcomplicate a more simple procedure. This is not the case in general, but there are indeed situations.